In the previous article, we discussed four kinds of prophetic fulfilment of the Old Testament in the New Testament. We used Matthew 2, because all four kinds of prophetic fulfilment occur in this one chapter. Today we continue the discussion, because prophetic fulfilment has such an important impact on one’s understanding of the end times (eschatology).
As we saw in the previous article, Matthew 2’s handling of the four kinds of prophetic fulfilment of the Old Testament in the New Testament can be deciphered and applied by modern-day exegetes of the Bible. When you find other prophetic fulfilments in the New Testament, you can classify such fulfilments using the four categories. That way, one can understand the text better.
There is no reason to believe that the authors of the New Testament used the Old Testament out of context or ‘creatively’, or that they changed or reinterpreted the meaning of the Old Testament (Rydelnik 2010:111; Fruchtenbaum 2016:43). The hermeneutical principle of normal, literal interpretation (grammatical-historical method) is not revoked in the New Testament, to the contrary, it is confirmed. There are rules for the interpretation of types and analogies, but it functions within the hermeneutical principle of normal, literal interpretation (the grammatical-historical method) and for this reason, the allegorization or spiritualization of parts of Scripture based on the existence of types and analogies cannot be justified (Feinberg, P.D. 1988:123; Malan 2014:14–16).
When there are typological, applicational or summation fulfilment of the Old Testament in the New Testament, does this not mean that all direct prophecies now fall away and/or change into the abovementioned typological and/or applicational and/or summation categories of fulfilment? No, definitely not! One must at least concede that direct Old Testament prophecies about Christ’s second coming will be fulfilled. But what about direct, unconditional and still unfulfilled non-Christological covenant promises and prophecies in the Old Testament? Will God fulfil these directly to the people to whom He made these promises? Concerning such prophecies and promises, the answer is resoundingly ‘yes’, because God cannot lie. God will do what he promised to those to whom He promised it, even if He made this promise or gave this prophecy only once (Feinberg, J.S. 1988:76–77). I agree with Turner (1985):
If NT reinterpretation reverses, cancels, or seriously modifies OT promises to Israel, one wonders how to define the word “progressive”. God’s faithfulness to his promises to Israel must also be explained. (p. 282)
Assume just for argument’s sake that national Israel is an Old Testament type for a New Testament antitype, namely the Church. Does this imply that unconditional and still unfulfilled Old Testament promises and prophecies regarding Israel are explicitly or implicitly taken over or transcended by the Church? No, it does not. Sometimes an Old Testament type is ended by the New Testament antitype. Old Testament ceremonial laws and institutions related to the Levitical priesthood under the Law of Moses are for instance ended in the New Testament. But is this the case with all type-antitype-relationships? The unconditionality of certain promises to Israel cannot even implicitly be taken away from Israel by the New Testament: ‘[U]nconditional promises are not shadows, nor are the peoples to whom they are given’ (J.S. Feinberg 1988:76). Further, ‘if the NT antitype cancels the meaning of the OT type, the NT must tell us so’ (J.S. Feinberg 1988:79). Turner (1985:282) affirms this: ‘Genuine typology and analogy between OT and NT should not be viewed as destructive to the literal fulfilment of the OT promises to Israel…’
The same kind of argument can be used for analogical fulfilment of the Old Testament in the New Testament. If the New Testament makes an application and adds a referent to an Old Testament promise or prophecy, does this cancel the Old Testament referent? The answer is once again ‘no’. For example, when Peter says on Pentecost that ‘this is what was spoken by the prophet Joel’ (Acts 2:16), what kind of fulfilment of Joel 2:28-32 is in view here? It is not a direct, typological or summation fulfilment, but rather an applicational or analogical fulfilment. Why? Joel 2:28-32 says that there will be great cosmological changes and that people will prophesy, dream and see visions. However, Acts 2 does not speak of cosmological changes and goes on to mention speaking in known languages, which Joel 2 does not mention. Further, the rules of typology have not been met and this is not a summation fulfilment. The analogy or correspondence is that both parts of Scripture have in view an outpouring of the Holy Spirit (cf. Feinberg, P.D. 1988:125–127). If the Church was born on Pentecost in Acts 2 and partakes in spiritual blessings in Christ, does this mean that the direct prophecy of Joel 2:28-32 will not be fulfilled to Israel at the end of this dispensation? No, in fact, it will indeed be fulfilled directly as God promised.
What about summation fulfilment? Some think that there is a ‘reality shift’ as one moves from the Old Testament to the New Testament, since prophetic fulfilment sometimes ‘rises above the boundaries of reality’ (Heyns 1963:27, own translation). Did the character of the kingdom not become spiritual and heavenly, rather than earthly or political (Waltke 1988:268, 270–271)? And if Christ is our peace and has made both Jew and Gentile believers in Him one new person (Eph 2:11-16), how can Israel still have a future as a nation (Hoekema 1979:199–200)? Blaising (2015:91-93) summarizes the non-dispensationalist position as follows: Old Testament promises made to Israel are fulfilled in Christ, the Church or in the new creation so that the reality shift takes place spiritually and Christologically away from Israel to Christ, away from the material, the earthly and the ethnic to the heavenly, spiritual and non-ethnic reality, or then to another kind of Israel, one where the land, the people and the nation is transcended. There is definitely a spiritual unity in the Church between believing Jews and believing non-Jews in Christ. Regarding justification, sanctification or ultimate glorification, there is absolutely no favouring of a Jew over a non-Jew, or the other way around. The underlying presupposition of the non-dispensationalist position – based on the idea of one covenant nation under the covenant of grace where many differences must be revoked in the name of continuity – is that the spiritual meaning cancels out or overrules any other kind of meaning (see Feinberg, J.S. 1988:71–73). But is this true?
Even within a local congregation, there are functional differences: some are leaders and others not (Heb 13:17); some have this gift and others have that gift (1 Cor 12:28–30). Does this mean that in Christ all functional differences between Jew and non-Jew, slave and free man or man and woman have been set aside (Gal 3:28)? No, it has not. The fact that both Jew and non-Jew are children of Abraham in a spiritual sense, does not suddenly make non-Jews into Jews or make them part of the people of Israel (cf. Saucy 1993:50). Fruchtenbaum (1989:76, 702) asks a valid question: If you believe that you are a child of Abraham, does this automatically make you a child of Jacob (whose name was changed to Israel)? Said differently: If all who belong to Christ are children of Abraham, does this mean that all Abraham’s children belong to Christ (see Rom 4:11–12; Gal 3:25–29)? Summation fulfilment does not cancel or change the direct, unconditional and as-yet unfulfilled Old Testament promises and prophecies.
Based on the above discussion, we summarise as follows:
- Whatever the relationship between the two testaments is, the meaning of the Old Testament should be discovered by means of the application of the principle of normal, literal interpretation (grammatical-historical method). Its meaning should not be gained primarily from the New Testament (Vlach 2012:24). The New Testament does not reinterpret, change or cancel the meaning of Old Testament texts.
- If the Old Testament is fulfilled in the New Testament, the fulfilment can be classified as (1) direct, (2) typological, (3) applicational/analogical or (4) as summation fulfilment.
- All Old Testament promises or prophecies given unconditionally to specific persons or groups of persons and that remains unfulfilled in the New Testament era, will be fulfilled directly to those to whom it was promised. Typological, analogical or summation fulfilment cannot eliminate unconditional and unfulfilled promises or prophecies made to Israel.
- God’s New Testament revelation makes additional applications and adds referents (references plenior), but it still does not change the meaning of the Old Testament texts in its original context. A New Testament antitype does not change or cancel the meaning of an Old Testament type, unless the New Testament explicitly says so (Feinberg, J.S. 1988:79).
- Israel and the Church are distinguishable; the Church is not the ŉew’, ‘true’ or ‘spiritual’ Israel.
- Even though there is spiritual unity between Jewish and non-Jewish believers in the Church since Acts 2, there are still different meanings for a term such as ‘children of Abraham’, since one meaning (for instance the spiritual) does not cancel the other meanings (biological, ethnic, national etc.) as Vlach (2012:34–35) points out.
The above is an English extract from:
Scholtz, J.J., 2016, ‘Vooronderstellings wat die eskatologie beïnvloed’, In die Skriflig 50(1), a2170.
Other sources to which the article refers to can be found in In die Skriflig.
Share with others:
[apss_share networks='facebook, twitter, pinterest']
How does the New Testament indicate that prophetic fulfilment of the Old Testament has taken place? This question is not dry, abstract or only of academic interest, because it has an important impact on the doctrine of end times (eschatology).
How does the New Testament indicate that prophetic fulfilment of the Old Testament has taken place?. also Rydelnik 2010:95–111), there are four kinds of prophetic fulfilment of Old Testament texts in the New Testament, namely:. Direct fulfilment; Typological fulfilment; Applicational or analogical fulfilment; and Summation fulfilment.. Fruchtenbaum (2016:12–13) notes that New Testament writers used the Old Testament in the same fourfold manner as the rabbis of that time, namely pshat (direct fulfilment), remez (typological fulfilment), drash (analogical fulfilment) and sod (summation fulfilment).. All four kinds of prophetic fulfilment occur in Matthew 2, so we illustrate the four different kinds of prophetic fulfilment of the Old Testament in the New Testament using Matthew 2.. This category of a literal fulfilment of a direct prophecy ( pshat ) is relatively simple, especially if most (or all) of the referents of the Old Testament prophecy are already known.. Some Old Testament prophecies’ referent(s) are not known, but the meaning of that Old Testament text is still adequately determinable (Feinberg, P.D., 1988:123).. The literal fulfilment of direct prophecies, like for instance Christ’s second coming and his work on earth, must happen and be fulfilled, otherwise it could imply – with respect, for the sake of argument – that Isaiah or Zechariah, for instance, could be viewed as false prophets, which they certainly are not.. While Hosea 11:1 describes a historical event where God calls a young nation Israel out of Egypt (‘out of Egypt I called my son ’), so the fulfilment quote in Matthew 2:15 shows that God will protect the little child and will have him return, for ‘out of Egypt I called my son ’.. Israel As A Type Of The Future King Of Israel The typology of Bileam’s prophecies Israel’s experience in the past is a foreshadowing of the King’s future experience Israel (Num 23:18-24)King of Israel (Num 24:7-9) God brings them out of Egypt.God brings Him out of Egypt.God is like the horns of a buffalo to them .God is like the horns of a buffalo to Him .Israel is like a lion.The King is like a lion.. Sometimes the New Testament adds additional referents ( references plenior ) to Old Testament texts to make an applicational or analogical fulfilment.. The fourth kind of fulfilment of the Old Testament in the New Testament is therefore summation fulfilment ( sod ), because the inspired text of the New Testament summarises what the prophets said collectively about something or someone (Fruchtenbaum 2016:38–40).. In the next article, we will discuss the prophetic fulfilment of the Old Testament in the New Testament further.
Jesus said very plainly, ''Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill.'' (Matt. 5:17) This article will be about how Christ's Church and its beliefs are prefigured in the Old Testament.
Also, do keep in mind Hebrews 10:1 which says, ''..since the law has but a SHADOW of the good things to come..'' Thus, as Matt Dula says, these Old Testament prefigurements are inferior to the New Testament's fulfilment.. 180 AD) Another parallel between Adam/Eve and Jesus/Mary is that Adam and Eve were created without sin and, since the Old Testament types are inferior to the Old Testament, Jesus and Mary would also have to be without sin.. Davidic King and Queen Mother VS Jesus and Mary. Also in Scott's TV show, he talks about how Jesus and Mary are prefigured in the Old Testament with the Davidic King and the Queen Mother.. 1 Kings 2:19 says, ''..a throne was provided for the king's mother..'' (NAB) 2 Kings 24:12 says, ''Then King Jehoiakim, along with his advisers, nobles, and officials, and the queen mother..'' and ''Say to the king and the queen mother,'' (Jeremiah 13:18).. In the Davidic Kingdom, there was a Prime Minister who was the king's representative.. After saying that Peter gets the keys, He gives him the authority to ''bind and loose.''. The Israelites were fulfilled with Christ's Church, so we are now a ''kingdom of priests'' (1 Peter 2:5-6).. The priests also had authority to make binding decisions (Deuteronomy 17:8-13).. Jesus said in John 3:5, ''..no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit.''. In Genesis 1:2, it says ''..the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters''.. As we know from the Old Testament, a dove represents the Holy Spirit, hence - water and Spirit are seen again.. In the first chapter of John's Gospel, we read about Jesus' Baptism, and how the Spirit decended upon Him like a dove.. Also, directly after speaking about water and the Spirit, He said ‘’After this Jesus and his disciples went into the land of Judea; there he remained with them and baptized.’’ (John 3:22)
Is the Gift of Prophecy for Today? Part 2 (of 4 parts) The second article in this series discusses the relationship of New Testament prophecy to Old Testament prophecy - by Dr. Farnell
The Spirit-empowered words of the apostles on Pentecost. were, therefore, evidence of the accuracy of Joel's. prediction (They were also a direct fulfillment of Christ's promise to send. the Holy Spirit; see Luke 24:49; John 14:16-18; 15:26-27; 16:7-15; Acts. 1:4-5, 8; 2:33).. . . the. prophets" (22:9).. In light of the promised return of prophecy, as seen in Joel 2:28-32 and. Acts 2:17-21, the prophetic Holy Spirit had been poured out on the people of. God once again.. Such care is also. evident by the fact that, along with apostles, New Testament prophets served. a vitally important role in the foundation of the early church, according to. Ephesians 2:20.. Just as the Old Testament prophets were to be examined, so too the. New Testament prophets were to be evaluated.. The Spirit of Yahweh is the Spirit of. prophecy (see, e.g., Neh.. According to Peter, the Holy Spirit was the Source of the prophet's. inspiration: "No prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men. moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God" (2 Pet.. Paul made known that early church prophets, along with the apostles,. received the important revelation of Gentile inclusion in the church (Eph.. According to John, the true. prophet brings forth genuine prophecy which has its source in God, while the. sign of a false prophet is false prophecy.. Because the Holy Spirit is the Source. behind the prophet of God in both, the. Spirit serves as the sovereign Guardian of the accuracy of prophecies from. God (cf.. In the phrase "foundation of the. apostles and prophets", does the word "prophets" refer to prophets of the. Old Testament or the New Testament?